[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Re: There Be Dragons

To: Multiple recipients of list <dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: There Be Dragons
From: tuckr@digital.net
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 13:55:34 -0500
Reply-to: tuckr@digital.net
Sender: dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu

> I have read the JC.  Some of the papers are quite good; others are idle
> speculation with a lot of fourteen letter words added in.  Falsifiable
> hypothese are not the prime focus of most of them...

    I hope you found the paper about the identification of the strange animal 
depicted on the 2500-year-old reliefs at Persepolis, Iran (ancient Persia), by 
Dr. Raul Valdez and me, to be reasonable.

----
-= Tuck =-
tuckr@digital.net

Prev by Date: Re: Cryptozoology?
Next by Date: Re: Marsupials -- on a dino list???
Previous by thread: Re: Re: There Be Dragons
Next by thread: Re: Re: There Be Dragons
Indexes: