[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Did Dinosaurs BECOME Oil?
From: Willa25743@aol.com
>
>While talking to my sister about dinosaurs, she commented that they "all
> turned to oil." ...
>
> I'm not really current with theories on how oil was formed, but my perception
> is that oil deposits more probably resulted much earlier from organic (even
> unicellular) matter deposited and fossilized at the mouths of prehistoric
> rivers.
This is roughly correct. There is some reason to suppose that oil
formation is still going on, for instance in the Mississippi Delta.
>
> * There is little or no connection between dinosaurs and the formation of
> oil.
True, as far as I can tell.
>
> * The dinosaur->oil connection is a widely-held misconception, especially
> among baby boomers.
>
This seems likely, but I have no basis for certainty on this matter.
> * Petroleum's sources are generally/always/often from earlier geologic times.
I think most economically important oil reserves do date from
Paleozoic times, but I would hesitate to say that oil deposits
in general *always* are that old.
>
> * Crude oil was formed in many ways, e.g. the disputed theory linking a
> Swedish asteroid impact crater with oil deposits.
I would place little credance on that "theory" - the guy is pretty
much a crackpot.
>From what little I have read, my impression is that oil mostly
forms from the degradation of microplankton when rapidly buried
and heated, as might happen in a major river delta. I have not
heard any serious proposals for any other substantial source.
>
> * There's little or nothing we can do to dispell this fanciful notion. It
> will have to fade away on its own. We should ignore/dispute dino-to-oil
> comments disseminated by mass media.
I disagree here. Folk tales do not fade away on their own. If we
who know do not actively correct these things, they will last
indefinately.
>
swf@elsegundoca.attgis.com sarima@netcom.com
The peace of God be with you.