RE:speculation/testability - Bergquist

[Crpntr@ix.netcom.com (Kenneth Carpenter)]

In order to avoid turning the issue of speculation/testability into a 
flame war, I publicly appologize to Mr. Lars Bergquist for upsetting him 
so as evidenced by his posting today.  Evidently my comments about 
Popper made him feel that I was hitting him over the head with my 
chair.  If anyone else felt that way also, I apologize to you as 
well.  

Mr. Bergquist's comment "Well-reasoned argument is what cuts ice..." is 
a good one and I assumed that is what I was doing by discussing that 
there is much in palebehavioral studies that cannot be tested.  
Apparently Mr. Bergquist feels that I failed to do so.  Oh, well... I 
tried.  On to other fun discussions....