Re: Tyrannosaurus bataar eggs

[Crpntr@ix.netcom.com (Kenneth Carpenter)]

Stan Friesen wrote: 


>
>Tarbosaurs have always been considered part of Tyrannosauridae,
>but they are now considered synonyms of Tyrannosaurus itself by
>many workers.


I know, I synonymized them in "Tyrannosaurids (Dinosauria) of Asia and 
North America. IN Mateer, N., and Chen, P. (eds.) 1992, Aspects of 
nonmarine Cretaceous geology.  China Ocean Press, p. 250-268"

> 
>Hmm, what is the relationship of this formation to the one in
>which Alectrosaurus was found?
>
>[If I remember my names correctly, Alectrosaurus is the earliest
>known tyrannosaurid - being Lower Cretaceous].
>


Actually Alectrosaurus is lower Late Cretaceous in age, probably too 
young for these eggs.  Besides, why assume these are tyrannosaurid eggs?