[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: ichnogenera and ichnospecies
> But no, you cannot use the body fossil name for a trace fossil, no matter
> how certain you are of its maker. To paraphrase a recently controversial
> question: Were you there to actually see what the trace-maker was? Then
> how can you be so certain? Another advantage to sticking with the
> ichnological name is that it tells people what you have, in fact,
> found--whether it is a set of foot bones or just the marking left by that
> foot as it walked along. So, if you abandon the ichnofossil name you
> have lost a bit of information in your attempt at communication.
Using the same logic, wouldn't you have to give a seperate name to
every individual trackway, even if footprints from two trackways are
virtually identical?
LN Jeff