In a message dated 95-12-02 09:01:04 EST, tuckr@digital.net writes: > > Oddly enough, the plural of manus is... manus! > > As George patiently pointed out to me some years ago and sent me back >to my dusty Latin books. (Which is why I stick mainly to Persian these >days.) Was it H. L. Mencken who once said, "One man's Mede is another man's Persian"?