[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Albertosaurus
At 2:25 PM 8/11/95, th81 wrote:
>Albertosaurus has NOT been renamed Dinotyrannus. George has suggested that
>the specimen from the Lancian, called ?Albertosaurus megagracilis by Greg
>Paul, was a distinct genus. So far, the only publication with Dinotyrannus
>has been Olshevsky & Ford's 1995 article in volume 10 of Kyoryugaku
>Saizensen, but I know that they are planning an American release.
Thom et al -
Since I don't have a copy, I can't verify this, but: doesn't the
ICZN state that any name for an organism -- even those not formally
described in "official" journals -- have to be considered synonyms (junior,
senior, etc.) until proven otherwise? I think this was a semantic point
within the ICZN (that is, not stating the "technical" peer-reviewed nature
of "official" journals) that was planned to be cleared up by the next
edition. I remember someone telling me this. Am I off base?
Jerry D. Harris
Schuler Museum of Paleontology
Southern Methodist University
Box 750395
Dallas TX 75275-0395
jdharris@lust.isem.smu.edu
(Compuserve: 73132,3372)
---------/O\------* --->|:|:|> w___/^^^\--o
TITLE OF A REAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER:
"South American Animals and Their Lice"
---------/O\------* --->|:|:|> w___/^^^\--o