naming conventions and the Net?

["Cunningham, Betty" <bcunning@nssi.com>]

        Will the ICZN ever recognise such things as the Dinosaur List as an 
     official publication?   Do they need the article to be 'edited' to be 
     official?
     
        Will the ICZN consider e-mail on such a broad mailing list (larger 
     than much of Bakker's self-published magazine's mailing list) as 
     sufficient peers to be recognised as official?
        
        What do you professionals think?  Especially since the mail is also 
     available as a digest, and can be downloaded even after the original 
     date of publication.  Thus perhaps satisfying the availability to the 
     science community.
     
     
     -Betty Cunningham
     (Flyinggoat@aol.com till the end of the month)
     (bcunning@nssi.com at work)
     (bettyc@flyinggoat.com after the end of the month)