[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
tucking (long)
>While we're on the subject, and now that the famed Greg Paul is in
>our midst (Hi Greg!), what does everyone think about the now-common
>pictures of theropods (etc.) running with the arms all tucked up? It
>does look kind of cool, but do you think it really happened? I'm
>certain that for aerodynamic reasons, they kept the arms close in to
>their _sides_, but I'm not so sure about having them all curled up (a
>la bird wings)...
Bipeds go both ways in what their extra appendages do when moving
upright.
Humans DON"T tuck their arms while running, we use the swing of the
arm to counterweight the leg movements. We move pretty fast and cover
a lot of ground as steady runners. We are built to run or walk over
long distances.
Most other primates rarely walk around on bipedally, but when they do,
they swing their arms as counterbalance, OR rock to the sides to aid
in counterbalancing. Monkeys and lemurs usually raise their arms
while walking and keep them stiff and out of the way OR rock to the
sides, rarely swinging them (usually the ratio of arm length exceeding
leg length is a simple explanation)
Basilisk lizards run with their arms tucked straight doun at their
sides. They only do bursts, and the arms are moved out of the way as
the "landing" of the lizard is usually abrupt and they need the front
legs ready to land on.
Birds that fly as their major means of transportation tuck their arms,
their wings don't move from a given position while running. (You can
tell by looking at the feather directions where the wings fold next to
the body-the imprint of the wing is a permanent growth-pattern.)
Birds that are trying to take off are excluded from this
discription.(they hold their arms out)
Birds that don't fly tend to raise their wings up off the back. They
don't flap or rotate the arms at all to aid counterbalancing. The
ostrich and emu may do this to cool the body. The penguin doesn't
flap to aid counterbalancing; I think it's more of a display function.
Bears keep their arms at their sides, while ambling on their hind
legs. If their arms are out for an attack, the arms don't swing, but
are sort of held in front of the bear as he uses his weight to fall on
his prey.
I believe that animals that are solely dependant on bipedal movement
will swing their arms in counterbalance as the final goal of their
evolution, as it is a great aid to distribution of weights and
balances during locomotion. Monkeys and lemurs aren't totally
dependant on walking or running, as brachiating is their main form of
movement. Birds that run are devolving the use of the wing entirely,
and would soon have vestigal remaints of arms (probably just for
display purposes). Penguins swim and the wings are used for that.
Thus:
large bipedal/quadrapedal dinosaurs such as hadrosaurs which spend
some time on all fours grazing (on whatever), would tuck while running
on two legs.
large therapods would probably run with arms up out of the way of
their feet, stiffly forwards, and in a position where their arms would
be out in an attack position (even stumpy T rex). They probably
walked with their arms tucked under their bodies. The size of the
arms in therapods tends to the vestigal sort of paradigm.
medium therapods and smaller therapods, ornithosaurs, coulesaurs,
hypsepholodons(sorry, I'm at work-no spelling check for names) all
quite probably swung their arms to counterbalance their weight. The
arms were of a significant size to affect weight shifts, and evolution
would tend to aid a mechanism that aids in aiding movement. The
shoulder girdles of the ornithosaurs wouldn't allow for much rotation
side to side, but plenty from front to back. Great arm swinging
stuff.
Betty Cunningham(Flyinggoat@aol.com)
(bcunning@nssi.com)