[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: protoavis
From: SRSCHM0@ukpr.uky.edu
> I am not real familiar with the protoavis topic, but, do I sense a little
> hostility to its discoverer and/or description? Personally, I would think
> any opinion is a significant contribution even though it may not be well
> supported.
>
Hostility is, perhaps, a little strong. The fact is that Chayyerjee
has a long record of going off half-cocked with bizarre phylogenetic
inferences based on superficial evidence. He is just not trustworthy
in that area.
What he *is* reasonably good at is finding and describing new organisms.
[He has diescovered several ineresting animals, including Poposaurus,
a very "advanced" "pseudosuchian"].
Unfortunately, in this case he has also publicized his ideas in
the popular press, thus making it harder to quietly ignore his
strangeness, as scientists would normally do.
swf@elsegundoca.ncr.com sarima@netcom.com
The peace of God be with you.