Re: Ceratops (was RE: Glishades ericksoni, ...)

[Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>]

On 13 May 2010 04:40, Paul P <turtlecroc@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> _Ceratops_ is actually excluded from
>> all proposed definitions of Ceratopsidae
>
> ? If so, that's only because it's a nomen dubium.
>
> Btw, "Ceratopsinae" is not used by ceratopsian experts. They
> already and always have used Chasmosaurinae. See Dinosauria,
> Dinosaur Systematics, etc.

That may be largely true, but it's certainly not unanimous.  For example,
Peter Dodson's book _The Horned Dinosaurs_ uses Ceratopsinae throughout.