[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: ps: No substitute for seeing a specimen: Hone blog



Oh, no worries! Wasn't really referring to you--yours was just the last post 
I'd read. Should have gone back to the original to avoid confusion. ;-)

--- On Sat, 5/8/10, Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com> wrote:

> From: Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: ps: No substitute for seeing a specimen: Hone blog
> To: nightimeshadow@yahoo.com, dinosaur@usc.edu
> Date: Saturday, May 8, 2010, 5:57 PM
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 16:47:17 -0700
> > From: nightimeshadow@yahoo.com
> > To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> > Subject: Re: ps: No substitute for seeing a specimen:
> Hone blog
> >
> > Even with a large number of well lit photos, I can't
> imagine how you could possibly interpret a specimen equally
> well as you would when seeing it in person. 
>  
>  I agree....I was being (silly); though, not being sure
> which smiley to use, I erred on the side of not using any.
>  
> apologies.
>  
> > --- On Sat, 5/8/10, Anthony Docimo wrote:
> >
> >> From: Anthony Docimo 
> >> Subject: ps: No substitute for seeing a specimen:
> Hone blog
> >> To: davidpeters@att.net,
> mike@indexdata.com
> >> Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
> >> Date: Saturday, May 8, 2010, 4:55 PM
> >>
> >>
> >> on second thought, maybe we could all have saved
> oh so
> >> much time and money if we had traced "Sue" and
> "Leonardo"
> >> instead of x-raying and CAT-scanning them.
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------
> >>> Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 22:51:46 +0000
> >>> From: keenir@hotmail.com
> >>> To: davidpeters@att.net;
> >> mike@indexdata.com
> >>> CC: dinosaur@usc.edu
> >>> Subject: RE: No substitute for seeing a
> specimen: Hone
> >> blog
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> References?
> >>>>
> >>>> Experiments?
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike, with your "That's how it is"
> paradigm we
> >> would have no relativity, no integrated baseball
> and the
> >> earth would be the center of a tiny universe only
> a few
> >> thousand years old.
> >>>
> >>> and if we trace everything, we would have no
> great
> >> artw
aradigm!
> >>>>
> >>>> Besides the challenge itself,
> >>>
> >>> what challenge? the "please don't reply to me"
> part?
> >>>
> >>>> Dr. Hone's comments were not backed up by
> >> evidence. Just simple musings.
> >>>
> >>> it's a BLOG.
> >>>
> >>> musings are the whole point of blogs.
> >>>
> >>>> And while he can say whatever he wants to
> say,
> >> we're all in this for the evidence. As scientists
> reporting
> >> on science, we shouldn't be making pronouncements
> that we
> >> can't back up. Right?
> >>>
> >>> in a publication, that's true. but a blog is
> not a
> >> publication.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> _________________________________________________________________
> >>> Hotmail has tools for t
> >
> ttp://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New
> Busy. Get
> >> more from your inbox.
> >> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
> >>
> >
> >
> >    
>         
>           
>   
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get
> more from your inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2