[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Paleontology becoming more collaborative?

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Paleontology becoming more collaborative?
From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:03:16 -0600
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <4b70ba4e1003171221v47670c2ar4def436b865dd8d5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <283914.97772.qm@web110407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4b70ba4e1003171221v47670c2ar4def436b865dd8d5@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: rtravsky@uwyo.edu
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu


On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Michael Barton wrote:

This may be of interest:

The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research
K. Brad Wray
Philosophy of Science, Vol. 69, No. 1 (Mar., 2002), pp. 150-168


Hmmm. Only one author...

References:
- Paleontology becoming more collaborative?
  - From: Saint Abyssal <saint_abyssal@yahoo.com>
- Re: Paleontology becoming more collaborative?
  - From: Michael Barton <darwinsbulldog@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: No posting about real fossils for sale
Next by Date: Another molecular clock...
Previous by thread: Re: Paleontology becoming more collaborative?
Next by thread: Another molecular clock...
Indexes: