[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Sauropod-eating snakes



>Alas, it appears that madtsoiids like _Sanajeh_ lacked a large enough gape to 
>swallow a big titanosaur whole.  So they were stuck with targeting hatchlings 
>and eggs (after crushing them first).

Wasn't too disappointed as the accompanying William Service narration describes 
the engagement as an unsuccesful attack that seems plausible:  the serpent 
instinctively strikes the young sauropod and coils around it.  It constricts 
but fails to suffocate the prey item, then finally relinquishes its grip and 
retreats.

Cheers
Brian
________________________________________
From: Tim Williams [tijawi@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 March 2010 10:14 AM
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Cc: Choo, Brian
Subject: RE: Sauropod-eating snakes

Brian Choo <bchoo@museum.vic.gov.au> wrote:


> Immediately brought to mind William Stout's 1981 madstoiid
> vs  titanosaur battle in "The New Dinosaurs".


Damn, me too!!!  The illustration Brian is referring to is here:


http://cafe.naver.com/rhflseh.cafe?iframe_url=/ArticleRead.nhn%3Farticleid=24


Alas, it appears that madtsoiids like _Sanajeh_ lacked a large enough gape to 
swallow a big titanosaur whole.  So they were stuck with targeting hatchlings 
and eggs (after crushing them first).


Cheers

Tim

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


http://museumvictoria.com.au/
This e-mail is solely for the named addressee and may be confidential.You 
should only read, disclose, transmit, copy, distribute, act in reliance on or 
commercialise the contents if you are authorised to do so. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify 
mailto:npostmaster@museum.vic.gov.au by email immediately, or notify the sender 
and then destroy any copy of this message. Views expressed in this email are 
those of the individual sender, except where specifically stated to be those of 
an officer of Museum Victoria. Museum Victoria does not represent, warrant or 
guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that 
it is free from errors, virus or interference.