[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: PNAS
On Wed, Feb 10th, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Denver Fowler <df9465@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Study challenges bird-from-dinosaur theory of evolution - was it the
> other way around?
>
> http://www.physorg.com/news184959295.html
>
> PNAS has recently published widely disputed (to put it mildly) papers
> on venomous theropods, and arthropod-velvet worm hybridisation
> hypothesis on the origin of larvae. Now this. Is peer review alive
> and well at PNAS?
Ruben said: "Many people saw what they wanted to see" instead of carefully
interpreting the data...
Oh the irony.
--
_____________________________________________________________
Dann Pigdon
GIS Specialist Australian Dinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj
_____________________________________________________________
- References:
- PNAS
- From: Denver Fowler <df9465@yahoo.co.uk>