[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: ?Lambeosaurus laticaudus mass

To: dinosaur <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: ?Lambeosaurus laticaudus mass
From: vultur-10@neo.tamu.edu
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 01:03:51 -0500 (CDT)
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <1342790772.9057491271656979219.JavaMail.root@neo-mail-3>
Reply-to: vultur-10@neo.tamu.edu
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

For which specimen? The type (LACM 17715) or the bigger LACM 26757?

For the type of ?L. laticaudus 4 tonnes seems about right.

Is this estimate published?

----- Original Message -----
From: GSP1954@aol.com
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 11:50:17 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: ?Lambeosaurus laticaudus mass

The correct mass for the specimen is in the area of 4 tonnes. 

GSPaul</HTML>

Prev by Date: Re: Which one would be the less environment-damaging way to read papers?
Next by Date: Re: Velociraptor Awareness Day
Previous by thread: Re: ?Lambeosaurus laticaudus mass
Next by thread: Which one would be the less environment-damaging way to read papers?
Indexes: