[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Weishampel et al.'s Formation Dates in The Dinosauria

To: Dinosaur Mailing List <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Weishampel et al.'s Formation Dates in The Dinosauria
From: Saint Abyssal <saint_abyssal@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <50760.69.255.167.54.1252347177.squirrel@hockeyboys.umd.edu>
Reply-to: saint_abyssal@yahoo.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Thank you for the quick reply, Dr. Holtz! I wish I could use stratigraphic 
journals as my source, but I don't have the time to track down information for 
all the formations I have to deal with one by one. I guess I'll be taking the 
oldest age and the youngest age given by Weishampel et al. as the start and end 
dates that the formation was deposited, unless someone out there thinks it 
would be unwise.

Thanks!

~Abyssal

References:
- Re: Weishampel et al.'s Formation Dates in The Dinosauria
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>

Prev by Date: Announcing The Open Dinosaur Project
Next by Date: Solnhofen Geology Request
Previous by thread: Re: Weishampel et al.'s Formation Dates in The Dinosauria
Next by thread: Cloudy With A Chance Of New Papers
Indexes: