[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dromomeron and Lagerpeton query

To: David Peters <davidrpeters@charter.net>
Subject: Re: Dromomeron and Lagerpeton query
From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:57:05 +0100
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: dinosaur mailing list <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <A7089B15-5555-4906-B28D-490D42AE89C6@charter.net>
References: <20090714153618.L1BW6.1764286.root@mp05> <B80E96112EF1467E926AAE06BAAD7488@LENOVO>
Reply-to: mike@indexdata.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

2009/7/19 David Peters <davidrpeters@charter.net>:
> You have accepted a series of short trees of suprageneric taxa rather than
> testing the entire Amniota with genus-based taxa.
>
> The tree topology is different than you were taught. The new tree give more
> answers. Solves old riddles.
>
> Synapsids, for instance, did not split off first.

Wait, wait -- you're saying that mammals nest INSIDE the crown group Diapsida?

Because that's the only way that Diapsida could be synonymous with Amniota.

References:
- Dromomeron and Lagerpeton query
  - From: David Peters <davidrpeters@charter.net>
- Re: Dromomeron and Lagerpeton query
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Dromomeron and Lagerpeton query
Next by Date: Re: anyone remember this?
Previous by thread: RE: Dromomeron and Lagerpeton query
Next by thread: Pot-bellied dinosaur from Utah
Indexes: