I'm going to be moderating a panel this weekend at a science fiction
convention called Readercon in suburban Boston. The title is "Is
Darwinism Too Good for SF?" and it's asking if evolutionary theory
"has been _too good_, too unassailable and too full of explanatory
power, to leave the wiggle room where speculative minds can play"
that science fiction writers need to write memorable stories. Are
there evolutionary counterparts of time travel and faster-than-light?
I know a few science-fiction fans are on the list, and I'm curious
how you'd answer those questions. Stephen Jay Gould's idea that
trying to repeat evolution wouldn't produce the same results comes
to my mind. What comes to yours?
--
Jeff Hecht, science & technology writer
jeff@jeffhecht.com or jhecht@nasw.org
525 Auburn St., Auburndale, MA 02466 USA
tel. 617-965-3834 http://www.jeffhecht.com