[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: re - Australovenator wintonensis

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: re - Australovenator wintonensis
From: B tH <soylentgreenistrex@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Reply-to: soylentgreenistrex@yahoo.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Sorry, I guess my wording should have been "does this CONFIRM the 'polar 
allosaur"...blabity-blah.  My bad.  

--- On Mon, 7/6/09, Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com> wrote:

> From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
> Subject: Re: re - Australovenator wintonensis
> To: soylentgreenistrex@yahoo.com
> Date: Monday, July 6, 2009, 8:49 AM
> 2009/7/6 B tH <soylentgreenistrex@yahoo.com>:
> > So does Australovenator effectively close the book on
> the 'polar allosaur' idea put forth in WWD/
> 
> No -- Australovenator IS a polar allosaur. 
> (Allosauroid rather than
> allosaurid, but still.)
>

Prev by Date: re - Australovenator wintonensis
Next by Date: Re: Floating pterosaurs
Previous by thread: Re: re - Australovenator wintonensis
Next by thread: Re: Floating pterosaurs
Indexes: