[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Time to get up to date?

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Time to get up to date?
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:49:11 +0100
References: <236E0E30-F919-4CF9-9957-C7AFEA599B20@att.net> <20090122134831.23810@gmx.net> <F7BFCA51ADE94DC08C820FF51633017C@LENOVO>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

and does not muck up URL's

Whether URLs get mucked up (and under which circumstances and in which ways) depends on your e-mail program, not on the fact that it's a mailing list.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time to get up to date?
  - From: frank bliss <frank@blissnet.com>

References:
- Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
  - From: David Peters <davidpeters@att.net>
- Re: Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- Re: Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: RE: Time to get up to date?
Next by Date: RE: Time to get up to date?
Previous by thread: Re: Time to get up to date?
Next by thread: Re: Time to get up to date?
Indexes: