[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Time to get up to date?

To: john.bass@ntlworld.com
Subject: Re: Time to get up to date?
From: jrc <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:12:26 -0600
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
References: <236E0E30-F919-4CF9-9957-C7AFEA599B20@att.net> <20090122134831.23810@gmx.net> <F7BFCA51ADE94DC08C820FF51633017C@LENOVO>
Reply-to: jrccea@bellsouth.net
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

What does that mean in plain language?
JimC

----- Original Message ----- From: "john hunt" <john.bass@ntlworld.com>

Is it not about time the DML moved into the 21st Century?

References:
- Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
  - From: David Peters <davidpeters@att.net>
- Re: Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- Re: Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
Next by Date: Re: Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
Previous by thread: Re: Time to get up to date?
Next by thread: Re: Time to get up to date?
Indexes: