[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Time to get up to date?

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Time to get up to date?
From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:16:10 -0800
In-reply-to: <3B683DE71249424C8CA10C03A6BEE9F0@LENOVO>
References: <236E0E30-F919-4CF9-9957-C7AFEA599B20@att.net> <20090122134831.23810@gmx.net> <F7BFCA51ADE94DC08C820FF51633017C@LENOVO>
Reply-to: keesey@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:52 PM, David Marjanovic
<david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:
>> Is it not about time the DML moved into the 21st Century?
>
> What for? I don't quite understand where the problem is...

I have to agree. Different types of Internet forum have different
strengths: mailing lists, bulletin boards, chatrooms, blogs with
comments -- I don't feel a need to give any up in favor of one.

-- 
T. Michael Keesey
Technical Consultant and Developer, Internet Technologies
Glendale, California

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time to get up to date?
  - From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>

References:
- Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
  - From: David Peters <davidpeters@att.net>
- Re: Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- Re: Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- Re: Time to get up to date?
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Time to get up to date?
Next by Date: Re: Sobral and Langer 2008 (was pteros have lift-off)
Previous by thread: Re: Time to get up to date?
Next by thread: Re: Time to get up to date?
Indexes: