On 30 May 2007, at 03:11, Steve Walsh wrote:
I have reason to review a lot of dinosaur books. I've often seen
illustrations in books of lesser quality that seem to be "inspired"
by the work of accomplished artists. In the example I've of put
together: http://www.dinosaurcentral.com/pic_comparison/ an
illustration by Luis Rey from "A Field Guide to Dinosaurs" seems to
have been pretty much duplicated for another much lesser quality
book. It has no artist credits but I'm pretty sure Luis had nothing
to do this cheapie (in another pic, again very similar to one found
in the Field Guide and obviously done by the same artist,
Ornitholestes sports a nasal horn). In any regards this kind of
thing does seem to happen quite a bit. I'm definitely not a
copyright expert and I understand this must be legal but I can't
see how this is not a form of plagiarism. Is this not the
equivalent of taking a short story or a paper and moving a few
sentences about? The newspaper industry certainly have a strict
policies about this as this example:
http://blog.fotolia.com/us/
images/Visual%20Plagiarism_photo.jpg resulted in getting someone
fired.
Steve Walsh
Email: steve.w@c-point.com | stevewalsh53@gmail.com
Home: 8 264 5526 | Mobile: 0422088197
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Better to light one small candle than to complain about the dark."
---------------------------------------------------------------
Outgoing mail is scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus 2006
Luis Rey
Visit my website
http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~luisrey