[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Gastric stones of dinosaurs were not for milling food !
Martin Baeker writes:
> >>how much food would they be able to gather -- 200kg?
>
> --------------- Relative to maximum acquisition capability *and*
> daily nutritional requirements-- don't know, that was one reason
> for the original post; to my surprise, no one has come up with
> numbers or references. Surely someone has made a jaw-model to
> constrain possible acquisition of leaf/mass per day by large
> sauros, but so far, I can't find their work. But yes, 200 kg seems
> do-able to me from the very rough estimates I have made.
I'm coming in half-way through this (I can't face the holiday-period
email backlog) so apologies if this has been mentioned, but Weaver
1983 took a stab at quantifying sauropod ingestion rates and the
nutritive value of the food:
Weaver, Jan. 1983. The Improbable Endotherm - The
Energetics of Brachiosaurus. Paleobiology 9(2):
173-182.
It's well worth a read, despite some flaws.
_/|_ ___________________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ DISCLAIMER -- These are my own opinions. Microsoft takes no
responsibility for them. Which is hardly surprising since I
don't even work for them.