[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Albertaceratops (simpson's bi-annual b*tch about dino naming)
> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu]On Behalf Of
> Tim Williams
>
>
> But if what you say is true (and
> you know much more about such things than I do), there is no etymological
> requirement for the genders to match within a genus name. In other words,
> it's just a convention, adopted more for imaginative effect than proper
> Latinization.
>
Precisely: it is a fashion, not a requirement. After all, paleontology went
from the 1820s until the 1970s before the naming of a
"-saura". (Unless I'm forgetting of one before _Maiasaura_).
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
Mailing Address:
Building 237, Room 1117
College Park, MD 20742
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~jmerck/eltsite
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: tholtz@geol.umd.edu
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796