[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
New Tatisaurus paper
Norman, D.B., Butler, R.C., and Maidment, S.C.R. (2007). Reconsidering the
status and affinities of the ornithischian dinosaur _Tatisaurus oehleri_
Simmons, 1965. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 150: 865-874.
Abstract: "The early Mesozoic fossil fauna collected from the Lower Lufeng
Formation of Yunnan Province, China, has attracted considerable interest and
attention since its discovery in the late 1930s. Its importance reflected a
combination of its comparatively remote geographical position and, more
particularly, the similarities of its fauna compared with approximately
contemporary discoveries from Europe, North and South America, and southern
Africa. The fragmentary and poorly preserved Lufeng ornithischian dinosaur
_Tatisaurus oehleri_ was described in 1965 and proved taxonomically and
systematically enigmatic from the start. Originally assigned, with some
noted ambivalence, to the basal ('primitive') group of ornithischians known
as hypsilophodontids, since 1965 _Tatisaurus_ has been variously ignored,
assigned to a more rigorously defined Hypsilophodontidae, referred to both
of the armoured (thyreophoran) ornithischian dinosaur clades (Stegosauria
and Ankylosauria), or referred to a more basal position within the
thyreophoran lineage. In 1996 the holotype of _Tatisaurus_ was renamed
_Scelidosaurus oehleri_, and the genus _Scelidosaurus_ was proposed as an
index fossil of the '_Scelidosaurus_ biochron' with the potential to be used
for the global stratigraphic correlation of Early Jurassic (early
Sinemurian) rocks. Because of this chequered history _Tatisaurus oehleri_
Simmons, 1965 has been re-examined and is redescribed so that its taxonomic
status and systematic position could be reassessed. _Tatisaurus_ is
identified as a basal thyreophoran (armoured ornithischian dinosaur); there
is no basis for amalgamating it in synonymy with the genus _Scelidosaurus_,
and the proposed creation of a '_Scelidosaurus_ biochron' for the purposes
of biostratigraphic correlation of Lower Jurassic outcrops has no utility
whatever."
The authors also regard _Tatisaurus oehleri_ as a nomen dubium.
Cheers, Tim
_________________________________________________________________
Find a local pizza place, movie theater, and more?.then map the best route!
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&ss=yp.bars~yp.pizza~yp.movie%20theater&cp=42.358996~-71.056691&style=r&lvl=13&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=950607&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01