[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Chicken teeth!
Matthew P. Harris, Sean M. Hasso, Mark W. J. Ferguson & John F. Fallon: The
Development of Archosaurian First-Generation Teeth in a Chicken Mutant,
Current Biology 16(4), 371 -- 377 (21 February 2006)
Summary (refs removed):
"Modern birds do not have teeth. Rather, they develop a specialized
keratinized structure, called the rhamphotheca, that covers the mandible,
maxillae, and premaxillae. Although recombination studies have shown that
the avian epidermis can respond to tooth-inductive cues from mouse or lizard
oral mesenchyme and participate in tooth formation, attempts to initiate
tooth development de novo in birds have failed. Here, we describe the
formation of teeth in the talpid^2 chicken mutant, including the
developmental processes and early molecular changes associated with the
formation of teeth. Additionally, we show recapitulation of the early events
seen in talpid^2 after in vivo activation of [beta]-catenin in wild-type
embryos. We compare the formation of teeth in the talpid^2 mutant with that
in the alligator and show the formation of decidedly archosaurian
(crocodilian) first-generation teeth in an avian embryo. The formation of
teeth in the mutant is coupled with alterations in the specification of the
oral/aboral boundary of the jaw. We propose an epigenetic model of the
developmental modification of dentition in avian evolution; in this model,
changes in the relative position of a lateral signaling center over
competent odontogenic mesenchyme led to loss of teeth in avians while
maintaining tooth developmental potential."
The teeth were hidden under the beak.
Quote from inside the article:
"We show the initiation of tooth developmental programs as well as the
formation of conical, saber-like structures on the lower jaw of the ta^2
chicken. The structures formed are similar to those seen in the
first-generation teeth of the alligator in position, histological
differentiation, and morphogenesis. This finding is consistent with the idea
that developmental programs are hierarchical and that atavisms will
reinitiate early steps before later processes of more complex teeth.
Previous reports interpreted tooth formation in light of knowledge of
mammalian tooth development and thus searched for the elusive chick molar.
Our work demonstrates a phylogenetic framework in which to interpret the
latent ability of avian embryos to form teeth apart from mammalian tooth
development."