Anatomically correct T. rex?

[JAMES ARONIS <Apollo@Mlink.net>]

With the recent spate of posts concerning anatomically correct 
theropods, specifically Tyrannosaurs, I was wondering if a striking 
restoration I have recently come across at CNN's site is anatomically 
correct. The restoration in question is of a _T. rex_ and can be viewed 
(head only) on this page:

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science/08/01/offbeat.trex.dinosaur.reut/index.html

My curiosity mainly lies in the accuracy of the restoration's rather 
large orbital 'horns', its dentition the longest of which appear longer 
than I imagined and the somewhat high position of the nasal openings. I 
won't inquire about the 'lips' factor since that already occupies space 
in another thread, but anyone can comment on that if they wish. With 
what we currently know of _T. rex_, how accurate is this restoration?

Thanks to anyone who can answer my inquiry.

James