[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Archosaurs of a feather

To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Archosaurs of a feather
From: MKIRKALDY@aol.com
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 10:23:56 EST
Reply-to: MKIRKALDY@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

The current Science (3/9/01) has an interesting letter from Richard Prum on 
"_Longisquama_ Fossil and Feather Morphology."  (He says that the appendages 
are not feathers for a variety of reasons.)  Dave Unwin and Michael Benton 
continue in the same "vane" in a separate letter rejecting the Jones et al. 
conclusions.  Jones et al. respond that yes, they are feathers and yes, it is 
an archosaur.

Mary
mkirkaldy@aol.com

Prev by Date: Bahariyasaurus ingens
Next by Date: RE: TRICERATOPS AND PSITTACOSAURUS ARE NOT OVERSPLIT
Previous by thread: Re: Bahariyasaurus ingens
Next by thread: Re: Archosaurs of a feather
Indexes: