[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Sabretooth
The wonderful Mary (Great to see at Mexico City) said...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> <MKIRKALDY@aol.com> 11/28/00 03:11PM >>>
In a message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2000 2:07:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
Chapman.Ralph@NMNH.SI.EDU writes:
> I thought it interesting that they thought they had
> only one chance to do the killing in each body
> section they thought was a possibility. They did the
> belly kill attempt first and when it didn't seem to
> work, gave up.
I think that it was at this point that Larry Martin said that by positioning
at this angle of attack, they would have broken the Smilodon's neck.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then they switched to a higher attack level, where they did the one attempt. I
also think biting the flank of a live side that is reacting to gravity would
provide a lot more easy insertion and cutting possibilities than a dead guy
lying on the ground. There's just more chance to get a good fold to bite
through.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some of this research was presented at SVP in Mexico City, with much more
technical data than was included on the Discovery program. Todd Wheeler (the
paleo-engineer) was the speaker on "Confirmation of Saber-tooth Killing Bite
Theories by Re-enactment." He showed slides but not the video, which was
embargoed because of the broadcast.
> little. I missed if they did any testing of bite
> force and compared with inferred forces from an
> actual skeleton.
This was presented at SVP but not on the program. Wheeler had configured the
backhoe/loader so that the bite forces could be varied.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I figured this was too easy to do right for them not to. The guy was pretty
sharp as far as I could tell, may contact him on some dino stuff. It is not
unreasonable to use metal without muscles to achieve the bone and muscle effect
as far as being able to produce the bite and not fall apart.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> I also somehow missed how they manufactured the fake
> sabreteeth and whether these would react to stresses
> the same way the real teeth would. I don't think they
> mentioned any of it
Probably thought too boring for viewers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
Shame - I'll have to think about a reasonable faux sabretooth that would have
the same strengths and weaknesses of a real tooth for trying out the bites with
organismal like constraints. Perhaps just get a system where you can record the
levels of stress/torque etc during the attack and see if they exceed reasonable
levels for the teeth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
One of the other talks at SVP (the Sacco/Van Valkenburgh one?) mentioned the
possibility that the canines served a display function, and that the animal
with the jaw at full gape could not see what it was biting into--affecting
the precision bite that would be needed in the above scenario.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you got em might as well flaunt them, but I cannot see them only serving
that purpose. Aren't sharks unable to see their prey while biting as well? If
you got a grip on a fold of skin or a neck, don't need to see, just gotta do
it. {Didn't Yoda say this? I guess it was there is no try, just do}.
I also liked the footage (seen before) of the tigers trying to get that young
elephant, tackling it and then unable to pierce the hide. Would give me a bad
feeling towards them for the rest of my life and suspect, given the brains of
elephants, that there will be payback time from that calf sometime.
Ralph Chapman
Ralph E. Chapman
Applied Morphometrics Laboratory
National Museum of Natural history
ADP, EG-15 NHB, 10th & Constitution, NW
Smithsonian Institution
Washington, DC 20560-0136
(202) 786-2293, Fax: (202) 357-4122
Chapman.Ralph@nmnh.si.edu