Re: NA therizinosaurs, Otogornis, Aublysodon and more

["Mickey_Mortimer" <Mickey_Mortimer@email.msn.com>]

Rob Gay wrote-

> Also in DoNM (which I just picked up this weekend), there's a section (p.
> 33-37) on sinking _Syntarsus rhodesiensis_ into _Coelophysis_. I know this
> was discussed on the list a while back, but I don't remember any talk
about
> how this affects _S. kayentake_. What happens there? Does this become _C.
> kayentake_, and _Syntarsus_ becomes a nomen dubium? Or does this become
the
> new type for _Syntarsus_?

Since Syntarsus kayentakatae is more closely related to S. rhodesiensis than
either is to Coelophysis bauri (Tykoski 1998), S. kayentakatae would become
a species of Coelophysis.

Mickey Mortimer