In a message dated 11/22/99 0:48:33 AM EST, bh480@scn.org writes: << Atlasaurus is NOT the same as "Cetiosaurus" mogrebiensis. >> But this sauropod does seem to be the nearly complete skeleton that was tentatively >referred< to Cetiosaurus mogrebiensis back in the early 1980s by Monbaron, does it not? (Haven't seen paper, so can't be sure.)