[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: when dinos ruled
Agreed, but this is true of most science documentaries. I've seldom seem
one about the universe, cosmology, relativity, or quantum physics that
wasn't filled with inaccuracies. And, when "authorities" are mentioned
or quoted, it's always the same authorities. For some reason the media
seems
to think that when they present a scientific subject to the public, that
they
have to "dumb" the subject matter down. I simply don't buy their logic.
Dwight
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. [SMTP:tholtz@geol.umd.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 10:33 AM
To: _smichael@excite.com
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: RE: when dinos ruled
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On
Behalf Of
> Sherry Michael
>
> While paleontology is a very generous science compared to many, we
can do
> more. Instead of bitching about how innacurate these shows are,
spread
> *good* information however you can. Donate a good dinosaur book to
school
> library. Speak to the public as much as possible. Open up the
> doors a little
> bit.
>
> -Sherry
> (off soapbox)
Me, hopping on...
By my observation, paleontologists in general and dinosaur
paleontologists
in particular are exceptional in getting to the public, speaking at
everything from local rock clubs to universities to big museums. My
colleagues who work on petrology and hydrology and such do not seem
to have
the opportunity for such presentations.
What galls me is that we DO give as much good data to the
documentaries as
we can!! When you see thirty seconds of a "talking head" on a show,
that is
distilled from a much longer interview, sometimes hours long. On
top of
that, plenty of faxes and fedexs are exchanged to provide accurate
photographs, drawings, diagrams, etc.
Then, via the magic that is filmmaking, this gets chopped up into
the same
hash that is always presented... Professional actors are hired to
narrate,
who somehow go about mispronouncing our names (Cathy "Forrester"?)
and the
names of our favorite critters. (Yeah, okay, I would imagine that
documentary narration is a LOW priority for most actors, and they
probably
did it in just a take or two, but they could try). Instead of
seeking to
educate, the emphasis is on entertainment, and those who do seek to
be
educated by these shows can be misled (as witnessed by email on the
list
earlier this week).
Yes, by all means, make the shows entertaining. Yes, try and bring
the
public up to date with some of the latest discoveries. I personally
had no
problem with the *concept* of the show: it was a great idea. The
problems I
(and from their postings, others) on the list have with the show was
the
*execution*: it didn't have to sacrifice accuracy for entertainment.
No documentary will every be perfect, and all of them "cheat" to a
certain
degree to produce something interesting to watch. However, there
are
documentaries on other topics on PBS or TLC or Discovery or Animal
Planet
which are both fun and accurate. Let's hope that future dinosaur
documentaries will try to achieve this goal.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
College Park, MD 20742
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/tholtz.htm
http://www.inform.umd.edu/SCHOLAR/programs/elt.html
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: tholtz@geol.umd.edu
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796