Re: Dino population sizes?

[psparks@CERF.NET (paul sparks)]

And even relative populations are hard to determine becuase of the relative
perservation chances and different places that they lived.  Highland dinos
are under represented wrt coastal dinos.  large dinos are oveer represented
wrt small dinos. and all that



>Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 15:43:09 -0400
>Errors-To: rowe@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu
>Reply-To: swf@ElSegundoCA.ATTGIS.COM
>Originator: dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu
>Sender: dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu
>Precedence: bulk
>From: Stan Friesen  <swf@ElSegundoCA.ATTGIS.COM>
>To: Multiple recipients of list <dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu>
>Subject: Re: Dino population sizes?
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Comment: If you want to unsubscribe but forgot how, ask
rowe@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu
>
>From: sean.kerns@sdrc.com (Snake)
> > 
> > Does the scientific community feel that they are able to realistically
> > gauge the size of the population of various dinos ...?
>
>Not really.  The best one can really do is estimate relative
>abundances.
>
>swf@elsegundoca.attgis.com             sarima@netcom.com
>
>The peace of God be with you.
>
>
paul w. sparks  Psparks@cerfnet.com
"over the heather the wet wind blows
I've lice in my tunic and a cold in my nose."
anon