[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Post-K Aussie Dinosaurs
I've been reading this thread with interest and expectation that it might
turn to post K dinosaur finds in general.
In *Dinosaurs Past and Present, Vol II*, J. Keith Rigby, Jr. begins....
"Six locations have now producted Paleocene dinosaur remains, primarily
teeth and more rarely bones, form screen-washed matrix obtained from the
upper part of the Hell Creek Formation, McCone County, Montana. These
fossils are thought to represent primary Paleocene deposition and are not
derived from Cretaceous bank sources..........."
I am curious about the disposition of Rigby's findings. Have his
conclusions received additional attention? Have they been discredited?
Ignored? His extensive field work and lengthy supporting arguments seem, to
this lay person, to be quite convincing.
Comments?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Small Editor of 'Fossil News and
Paleontology': Monthly
magazine for the enthusiastic
bonebug@halcyon.com amateur
-------------------------------------------------------------------